Showing posts with label Regional Integration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Regional Integration. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

EAC Non Tariff Barriers

This is a useful statement by the H.E President Uhuru to EALA on removal of non tariff barriers (NTBs) in the EAC urging increased collaboration between EALA and the private sector.

EALA recently passed binding legislation on NTBs in the EAC, legislation which will need to be assented to by EAC Heads of State. Termed the East African Community Elimination of Non-Tariff Barriers Bill, 2015 ", it gives legal effect to Article 13 on the establishment of the East African Customs Union. The law uses the WTO categories of non tariff barriers as set out in its schedule. The Act shall take precedence over any other laws Partner States may enact affecting NTBs. The legislation can be found here.

Current Acts of the EAC Legislative Assembly can be found here.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Can Africa Feed Africa?

A new World Bank report Africa Can Help Feed Africa: Removing barriers to regional trade in food staples ―says that Africa’s farmers can potentially grow enough food to feed the continent and avert future food crises if countries remove cross-border restrictions on the food trade within the region. According to the Bank, the continent would also generate an extra US$20 billion in yearly earnings if African leaders can agree to dismantle trade barriers that blunt more regional dynamism. The report was released on the eve of an African Union (AU) ministerial summit in Addis Ababa on agriculture and trade.


According to the report “Africa has the ability to grow and deliver good quality food to put on the dinner tables of the continent’s families, however, this potential is not being realized because farmers face more trade barriers in getting their food to market than anywhere else in the world. Too often borders get in the way of getting food to homes and communities which are struggling with too little to eat.”

With many African farmers effectively cut off from the high-yield seeds, and the affordable fertilizers and pesticides needed to expand their crop production, including unpredictable weather patterns, the continent has turned to foreign imports to meet its growing needs in staple foods.


See full report here for some policy considerations.

Friday, May 3, 2013

WB 2013 Doing Business Report on the EAC

The World Bank Doing Business is a tool that measures regulations that enhance business activity and those that constrain it and it also measures regulatory quality and efficiency.

There has been a recognition that regional integration alone is not enough to spur growth. The EAC needs an investment climate—including a business regulatory environment—that is well suited to scaling up trade and investment and can act as a catalyst to modernize the regional economy. Despite the reform efforts of all 5 member economies, the EAC’s average ranking on the ease of doing business has remained fairly constant over the past 4 years, at around 117 and in fact comparing the 2010 Doing Business performance to 2013, the EAC has seemingly not registered much of an improvement. This is a clear indication that critical obstacles to entrepreneurial activity remain and that economies in other regions have picked up the pace in improving business regulation. Improving the investment climate in the EAC is therefore an essential ingredient for successful integration—the foundation for expanding business activity, boosting competitiveness, spurring growth and, ultimately, supporting human development.

The development of regional strategies and institutional frameworks that connect and streamline national reform programs is an indispensable condition for a well-functioning common market that can attract foreign investment. A lack of coordination among member countries and the implementation of “isolated” national reforms—which often focus on short-term gains and fail to consider the impact on the region—can hinder progress in fully implementing the common market. Conversely, continual exchange among different authorities across countries, the implementation of an agreed-on regional reform agenda and a focus on common goals and objectives create synergies and help the region as a whole to improve its investment climate.

Fostering economic growth by tapping the potential of the private sector is among the main objectives of the fourth EAC development strategy. In addition to increasing institutional coordination, other important steps to achieve this objective are better integrating small and medium-size enterprises into the financial sector and creating business-friendly administrative structures and tax regimes. Additional challenges are to ensure the availability of reliable data and statistics and to implement credible surveillance and enforcement mechanisms.

The EAC economies have an average ranking on the ease of doing business of 117 (among 185 economies globally). But there is great variation among them—from Rwanda at 52 in the global ranking to Burundi at 159. This wide variation in business regulations is among the issues that the EAC needs to tackle to achieve the desired level of integration. While the regional average ranking is less than ideal, if a hypothetical EAC economy were to adopt the region’s best regulatory practices in each area measured by Doing Business, it would stand at 26 in the global ranking on the ease of doing business. Burundi was among the world’s most active economies in implementing regulatory reforms in 2011/12. It implemented policy changes in 4 areas measured by Doing Business: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, registering property and trading across borders.

One area where the EAC shows strong performance is business start-up. To start a business in the EAC requires only 8 procedures and 20 days on average. As such the EAC’s average ranking on the ease of starting a business is 84, higher than those of other regional blocs in Africa—104 for the Southern African Development Community (SADC), 110 for the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) and 127 for the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)

The 2013 Doing Business Report on the EAC can be downloaded here.

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

EAC Industrialization Policy 2012-2032

The EAC Industrialization Policy and Strategy provides general contours of policy intentions and strategic areas of focus to guide EAC towards achieving the set goals and in particular, attaining industrialized economic status by 2032. The EAC Industrialization Policy is intended to address the challenges facing the region particularly, the need to build a more diversified regional economic structure. 

The formulation of the policy was accomplished through a comprehensive and inclusive process, based on analysis and wide consultations with stakeholders in the Partner States. The policy is aligned to the relevant Articles of the Treaty in particular Article 79 and 80 which provide for regional co-operation in matters of industrial development as well as Article 44 of Common Market Protocol in which the Partner States undertake to adopt common principles to cooperate in Industrial Development in the region. 

The Partner States have set themselves ambitious targets to be met within the timeframe, of the policy as follows: 
a) Diversifying the manufacturing base and raising local value added content (LVAC) of resource based exports to 40% from the currently estimated value of 8.62 % by 2032; 
b) Strengthening national and regional institutional frameworks and capabilities for industrial policy design and implementation; and delivery of support services to ensure sustainable industrialization in the region; 
c) Strengthening R&D, Technology and Innovation capabilities to facilitate structural transformation of the manufacturing sector and upgrading of production systems; 
d) Increasing the contribution of (i) intra regional manufacturing exports relative to total manufactured imports in to the region from the current 5% to about 25% by 2032 
e) increasing the share of manufactured exports as a percentage of total merchandise exports to 60% from an average of 20%; and
f) Transforming Micro Small and Medium Enterprises into viable and sustainable business entities capable of contributing up to 50% of manufacturing GDP from 20% base rate.

To address the industrialisation challenges, the following broad policy measures will be undertaken:

1. Promoting the Development of Strategic Regional Industries/Value Chains; and enhance Value Addition
2. Strengthening national and regional institutional capabilities for industrial policy design and management
3. Strengthening the capacity of industry support institutions (ISIs) to develop and sustain a competitive regional industrial sector
4. Strengthening the Business and Regulatory Environment
5. Enhancing access to financial and technical resources for Industrialization
6. Facilitating the development of, and access to appropriate industrial skills and know-how
7. Facilitating the Development of Micro, small and medium enterprises (MISMEs)
8. Strengthening Industrial Information Management and Dissemination Systems
9. Promoting equitable industrial development in the EAC region
10. Developing supporting infrastructure for industrialisation along selected economic corridors
11. Promoting regional collaboration and development of capability in industrial R&D, technology and innovation
12. Promoting sustainable Industrialisation and environment management
13. Expansion of trade and market access for manufactured products
14. Promoting Gender in industrial development.

To exploit the resource endowment in the region and enhance the region’s industrialisation levels, the EAC Industrialisation Policy has earmarked six strategic resource-based industries, in which the region has a comparative advantage and which will be developed to facilitate productive integration (PI) through industrial deepening, diversifying, specialisation and upgrading. The strategic regional industries to be promoted include:

1. Agro processing
2. Iron steel processing and other mineral processing
3. Chemicals (fertilizers and agro chemicals)
4. Pharmaceuticals
5. Energy
6. Oil and gas processing

See the Policy and related documents here.








Monday, April 22, 2013

EALA Calls for Elimination of Work Permit Fees in the EAC

The East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) has passed a Motion for a Resolution advocating for the elimination of work permit fees for EAC citizens in the spirit of enhancing free movement of workers in line with the freedoms in the EAC Common Market Protocol.  

In this respect, the Assembly also commended the Republic of Kenya and Rwanda for taking the first steps in eliminating the work permit fees for the citizens of the EAC and urged the United Republic of Tanzania, the Republic of Burundi and the Republic of Uganda to emulate the same spirit.

Article 49 of the EAC Treaty establishes EALA as the legislative organ of the Community.  Like most legislatures EALA has as its core functions legislating, oversight and representation. Article 49 further states that EALA:



  • Shall liaise with the National Assemblies of Partner States on matters relating to the Community;
  • Shall debate and approve the budget of the Community;
  • Shall consider annual reports on the activities of the Community, annual audit reports of the Audit Commission and any other reports referred to it by the Council;
  • Shall discuss all matters pertaining to the Community and make recommendations to the Council as it may deem necessary for the implementation of the Treaty;
  • May for purposes of carrying out its functions, establish any committee or committees for such purposes as it deems necessary;
  • Shall recommend to the Council the appointment of the Clerk and other officers of the Assembly;
  • Shall make its rules of procedure and those of its committees

The Resolution passed in the House notes that EAC citizens have been subjected to altered work permit fees in the region which are divided in to several classes catering for different professions.    The United Republic of Tanzania according to the Resolution has a total of 13 sub-classes, Uganda 9, while Rwanda and Burundi have 2 sub-classes each. 

The Resolution moved by Hon Bernard Mulengani and seconded by Hon Abubakar Zein Abubakar, takes cognisance of the fact that Article 76 of the Treaty for the establishment of the EAC recognises that within the Common Market Protocol (CMP), there shall be free movement of labour, goods, services, capital and the right of establishment.   Article 10 of the Common Market Protocol on its part, guarantees that the Partner States do provide for free movement of workers, who are citizens of the other Partner States within their territories.

Regulation 6 of the Free Movement of Workers Regulations in the EAC Common Market Protocol (CMP) states that a worker shall apply for a work permit from the competent authority within 15 days of entry into the territory of a Partner State provided they have a valid contract of employment for a period of more than 90 days.

According to the Resolution, the current fee charged to obtain work permits also vary.  In the United Republic of Tanzania, the fees range from USD 6 for peasants up to USD 3,000 for miners while in Uganda it ranges from USD 250 for missionaries up to USD 2500 for miners.   In Burundi, the fees range from USD 60 for students to USD 84 for regular workers.  The objective of the work permit is seen as a mode of earning revenue and taxes or regulation of free movement of workers.

In the Resolution thus, EALA urged the Council of Ministers to call for harmonisation of national laws in order to allow for free movement of labour and services.

Supporting the motion, Hon Abubakar Zein Abubakar said the move would create a sense of ‘East Africaness’ and would ensure ultimately, ‘Brand East Africa’ is realised.  He called for a sense of identity and mutual benefit amongst citizens and said abolishing work permits was a step in that direction.  Others noted the Motion as timely to take the integration to the next level that the region had continued to realise some benefits accruing from the Common Market Protocol and noted that the imaginary fears especially about loss of revenue and insecurity should be dispelled.  The legislator noted that today over 170 Kenyan companies had set up operations in Rwanda and the move was greatly benefiting Rwandans.   

Hon Maryam Ussi supported the motion with caution noting that there were still threats of terrorism around the borders.   ‘If international passports can be forged, then even the East African passports are subject to forgery’, the legislator remarked. On equality of jobs and provision of services, others noted that many citizens were still unable to work in the neighbouring Partner States and its was further noted that some Partner States were hiding behind bureaucracies to deny free movement noting that currently, work permit fees were also high. ‘I congratulate Kenya and Rwanda for the move to withdraw permit fees and also note that Kenya and Uganda are working on a similar bilateral move’, Hon Nakawuki said.  It was also noted that the issue of permits had been used as Non-Tariff Barriers and said the decision by Rwanda and Kenya to collaborate in the matter exemplified the Principle of Variable Geometry which applies in the integration model. 

Rising in support of the motion, Hon Abdullah Mwinyi however maintained that work permits were a monitoring instrument in absence of the identity cards.  ‘I request for a scientific analysis to see the amount of revenue raised by the citizens of the region arising from the work permits’ the Member noted.

In response, the Deputy Minister of EAC in the United Republic of Tanzania, Dr. Abdulla Sadaalla noted that harmonisation of the national laws was currently in progress and that United Republic of Tanzania had reviewed relevant laws, in alignment to the Common Market Protocol.’ I can confirm that we have finalised the review process and are now awaiting the process of ratification’, the Minister remarked.  Hon Leontine Nzeyimana, Minister of EAC in the Republic of Burundi pledged the Ministry would pursue the removal of the work permit fees with the authorities.

The Chair of the Council of Ministers, Hon Shem Bageine reiterated the need for all Partner States to fully implement the Common Market.  He lauded the Republics of Kenya and Rwanda for the bold move in abolishing permit fees.   Hon Bageine remarked that Republic of Uganda recently made the decision to abolish work permit fees for citizens in Uganda.   He noted that at the moment, it was necessary to abolish the work permit fees but eventually, once we federate, (Political Federation), then the work permits would be totally removed.   The Council of Ministers, Hon Bageine remarked, shall deliberate into the matter and make the necessary follow-up with regards to ensuring the full implementation of the Common Market Protocol.



Wednesday, May 2, 2012

EAC Stockbrokers Adopt Compulsory Certification Training

Both the East African Securities Regulatory Authorities (EASRA) and the East African Stock Exchanges Association (EASEA) have agreed that professional Capital Market employees will be required to take a certification course, whose curriculum the two bodies have agreed on. The certification aims to standardise qualification requirements for key market activities in the EAC such as trading, asset management, and investment banking. Since certification is being implemented at a regional level, it should be standardised and ideally recognised globally, which allows a graduate to work anywhere. In this regard, the EAC Common Market Protocol under Part D on Free Movement of Persons and Labour, provides provisions on Harmonisation and Mutual Recognition of Academic and Professional Qualifications (Article 11) and hence an advantage of the certification training is that certified staff in the EAC can work in other EAC stock exchanges.

This is also important because the EAC Common Market Protocol (CMP) provides for the Free Movement of Capital in Part G Articles 24-28. Certification is therefore also important with regard to regional integration and capital account liberalisation. The CMP provisions provide for the elimination of Restrictions on the Free Movement of Of Capital which are reflected in Annex VI (Schedule on the Removal of Restrictions on the Free Movement of Capital). The Schedule contains commitments in equity and portfolio investments, bank transactions, repatriation of proceeds from sale of assets and other transfers and payments relating to investment flows.

Formal certification procedures will also help the market players to have a clear understanding of market regulations and the requisite qualifications to perform their responsibilities. It is acknowledged that a lack of properly qualified staff and fraudulent trading of customers’ shares was blamed for the collapse of Kenyan stock brokerage firms between 2007 and 2010.

Scheduled courses under the programme include fundamental securities, market participants training, officers and directors course. The certification course was agreed upon during an EASRA consultative meeting that was held in Bujumbura, Burundi, in March however, rules on frequency of training, examinations and those to be exempted based on other courses taken are yet to be finalised.

There are, however, other programmes in the region that have been running on a voluntary basis and without certification such as those run by the Securities Industry Training Institute, which is based in Kampala.

The most outstanding achievement in terms of EAC capital markets integration so far has been the cross listing initiative that has made it possible for seven, five and three companies to cross list from the NSE to the USE, DSE and RSE respectively. A road map for the integration of the EAC capital markets has also been developed to guide the integration process in the EAC capital markets industry in light of the EAC Common Market Protocol and in preparation for the proposed East African Monetary Union.



Related information can be found on Business Day

Friday, February 24, 2012

A Look at Turkey's Trade Policy and FTA with Mauritius

Turkey concluded an FTA with the first Sub Saharan African country, Mauritius, on September 9th 2011 and is expected to initiate negotiations with other EPA and EC FTA signatories.  This is because the customs union between Turkey and the EU, which entered into force on 1 January 1996, has been the main factor shaping Turkey's foreign trade policy.  In addition, the EU opened accession negotiations with Turkey in October 2005 and guidance on reform priorities is provided through the Accession Partnership, adopted in February 2008.

In the EU-Turkey customs union, the EU unilaterally eliminated all customs duties and equivalent measures for industrial products and processed agricultural products when the trade-related provisions of the Interim Agreement of the Protocol entered into force in September 1971, whereas Turkey as a developing country was accorded a transition period of 22 years.  

The EC-Turkey customs union also provides for a common external tariff for the products covered, and foresees that Turkey will align its trade-related legislation with the EU acquis in several areas essential for market access, e.g. with respect to product standards.  The customs union covers all industrial products as well as the industrial component of processed agricultural goods, TRIPS, and competition policy, but does not extend to agricultural commodities, services, or government procurement.  The EU however offers Turkey a preferential regime on imports of certain agricultural products. Negotiations on services and government procurement were launched in 2000, but are now part of Turkey's accession process. 

The customs union also provides provision for:

  • free movement (elimination of customs duties and quantitative restrictions) 
  • alignment of Turkey on the EC common external tariff, including preferential arrangements (even GSP), and harmonisation of commercial policy measures;
  • approximation of customs law, and
  • approximation of other laws (intellectual property, competition, taxation, etc.)
  • the adoption by Turkey of measures equivalent to the EU's common commercial policy

The European Union remains Turkey's most important trading partner and investor.  For instance, the EU accounted for nearly 70% of total FDI inflows into Turkey during 2005-10.  Nearly 40% of its imports come from the EU, and just over 50% of exports go to the EU. Machinery and transport equipment dominate EU imports from Turkey followed by manufactured articles which account for 24.3%. Main EU exports to Turkey are machinery and transport material (45.1%), chemical products (17.1%) and manufactured goods (15.1%).Globally,  Turkey ranks 7th in the EU's top import list and 5th as an export market.  However, the dominance of the EU in Turkey's foreign trade has declined markedly over the last five years, reflecting a notable shift in Turkish exports towards growth markets in its neighbourhood, in North Africa, certain CIS countries, and in Asia. 

Other main Turkish export markets in 2010 were Iraq (5.3%), Russia (4.1 %), USA (3.4%), United Arab Emirates (2.9%) and Iran (2.7%). Imports into Turkey came from other key markets include: Russia (11.7%), China (9.4%), USA (6.7%), Iran (4.2%) and South Korea (2.6%). 

Turkey currently has about 17 FTAs in force which include one with the EFTA countries, Israel, Macedonia (FYR), Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Palestinian Authority, Tunisia, Morocco Syria, Egypt, Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Georgia, Chile, Jordan, Lebanon and Mauritius.

The Mauritius-Turkey FTA provides enhanced duty free access on most industrial products.  All Mauritian industrial products will enter Turkey duty free with the exception of some 70 lines related to textiles which will be phased on four years.  Mauritius in return will offer duty free access to more than 80% of its tariff lines to Turkish industrial products.  In any case Mauritius is a duty free island with over 80% of applied tariffs at zero. 

Why the exclusion of agricultural products? Turkey, even though a member of the G-33 , ranks amongst the largest agricultural producers in the world and the main crop is wheat of which the country is over 90% self-sufficient. With corn, Turkey is about 80% self-sufficient and is a net-exporter of barley. Other major crops include fruit and vegetables, nuts, tobacco, cotton, and sugar. Turkey is also one of the major milk producers in the world, predominantly for domestic consumption of cheese and yoghurt.  While Turkey has specialized feed lots and dairy farms, and large-scale commercial poultry farms, livestock production is mainly extensive and small-scale.  

Useful to note that Turkish agricultural policy was adopted with a view to aligning it more closely with the EU Common Agricultural Policy.  Turkey's main policy objectives are food security and food safety, and raising the self-sufficiency level for selected net-imported products;  improving productivity and competitiveness;  ensuring sustainable farm incomes;  rural development;  and improving institutional capacity.

For comparison, by the end of 2007, the 6 ESA EPA States: Comoros, Madagascar, Mauritius, Seychelles, Zambia and Zimbabwe agreed an interim EPA with the EU. Mauritius in that agreement submitted an individual schedule which is annexed to the interim EPA and liberalises 96% of EU imports into Mauritius compared to a liberalisation of 80% with Turkey, possibly due to the inclusion of some agricultural products in the EPA.

What appears unfortunate in the Mauritius-Turkey FTA is that Turkey seems to have offered market access predominately in industrial goods, where Turkey is competitive. However few SSA African countries are neither productive nor competitive in industrial manufacturing. With Turkey being an emerging industrial exporter, the loss of revenue on the import side for African countries could be an area of concern. In agriculture, Turkey provides subsidized support which is equivalent to the EU Common Agricultural Policy.  

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

The EU Single Market Services Directive

The Directive on Services in the Internal Market (the Services Directive 2006/123/EC) was adopted in December 2006. The Directive liberalises the internal EC services market in that it requires Member States to abolish discriminatory requirements, such as nationality or residence requirements, and particularly restrictive requirements, such as “economic needs” tests (requiring businesses to prove to the authorities that there is a demand for their services). It also requires the review of other burdensome requirements which may not always be justified (such as territorial restrictions or minimum number of employees).

The EU member States were provided a three-year transitional period to transpose the Directive into national legislation. However, several member States missed the end-2009 deadline, and work to implement the Directive continued throughout 2010. The Directive requires the Member States to simplify procedures and formalities that service providers need to comply with. In particular, it requires Member States to remove unjustified and disproportionate burdens and to substantially facilitate: the establishment of a business, i.e. cases in which a natural or legal person wants to set up a permanent establishment in a Member State, and the cross-border provision of services, i.e. cases in which a business wants to supply services across borders in another Member State, without setting up an establishment there. 

During 2010, the Commission was monitoring the implementation by the member States, of both the new legal frameworks adopted in order to implement the Services Directive as well as their efforts to establish operational "Points of Single Contact" (PSCs), notably the online portals providing businesses with information about the requirements and procedures to be complied with, and the "Internal Market Information Systems" facilitating administrative cooperation between the authorities of the member States. The PSCs are certainly the most visible benefit of the Services Directive for businesses. They are meant to become fully fledged e-government portals allowing future entrepreneurs and existing businesses to easily obtain online all relevant information relating to their activities (applicable regulations, procedures to be completed, deadlines, etc.) with the ability to apply online and across borders. 

Although the vast majority of the member States have chosen to implement the general principles and obligations of the Directive through a single act, implementation of the general principles has been carried out through several acts in France and Germany. In addition, all member States have had to amend or abrogate existing legislation to ensure conformity with the provisions of the Directive.

The Services Directive does not harmonize national legislation applicable to the services sector, but obliges member States to screen their authorization schemes to ensure that they are maintained only if non-discriminatory, justified by an overriding reason relating to public interest, and proportionate.

The Services Directive applies to the provision of a wide range of services – to private individuals and businesses – barring a few specific exceptions. For example, it covers: 

distributive trades (including retail and wholesale of goods and services) 
the activities of most regulated professions (such as legal and tax advisers, architects, engineers, accountants, surveyors) 
construction services and crafts 
business-related services (such as office maintenance, management consultancy, event organisation, debt recovery, advertising and recruitment services) 
tourism services (e.g. travel agents) 
leisure services (e.g. sports centres and amusement parks) 
installation and maintenance of equipment 
information society services (e.g. publishing – print and web, news agencies, computer programming) 
accommodation and food services (hotels, restaurants and caterers) 
training and education services 
rentals and leasing services (including car rental) 
real estate services 
household support services (e.g. cleaning, gardening and private nannies). 

The Services Directive does not apply to the following services, which are explicitly excluded:

financial services 
electronic communications services with respect to matters covered by other community instruments 
transport services falling into Title V of the EC Treaty 
healthcare services provided by health professionals to patients to assess, maintain or restore their state of health where those activities are reserved to a regulated health profession 
temporary work agencies' services 
private security services 
audiovisual services 
gambling 
certain social services provided by the State, by providers mandated by the State or by charities recognised as such by the State 
services provided by notaries and bailiffs (appointed by an official act of government). 

The Commission has not drawn up concrete plans to cover the other excluded services. Services activities are in any event always subject to the EC Treaty provisions, notably the fundamental freedoms of establishment (Article 43) and free movement of services (Article 49). The Services Directive applies only to EU (EEA) citizens and legal entities established in the EU (EEA), and does not oblige member States to consider changes applicable to non-EU services suppliers. 

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

COMESA-EAC and SADC Launch Climate Change Intitiative

The East African Community (EAC), Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) and the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) have launched a joint five-year Programme on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation. The focus of the Programme is increasing investments in climate resilient and carbon efficient agriculture (climate-smart agriculture) and its linkages to forestry, land use and energy practices by 2016. The programme has received $20 million funding from the Royal Government of Norway, the European Union Commission and UK’s Department of International Development (DfID), signifying an exemplary partnership between Africa and Europe on climate change.

The three RECs comprising the Tripartite will synergize on their respective comparative advantages that include: main-streaming climate change in national and regional policies and strategies; climate resilient and climate smart agriculture; vulnerability assessment and disaster risk reduction approaches; and climate change policy negotiations to provide African solutions to climate change.

EAC’s key achievements in the area of climate change over the last few years include: approval of the EAC Climate Change Policy and issuance a Declaration on Food Security and Climate Change by the EAC Summit; the establishment of the EAC Climate Change Fund and Climate Change Coordination Unit at the EAC Secretariat; as well as the development of a Regional Climate Change Position as input to the African Common Negotiating Position on Climate Change.

See full article here and previous articles on climate change here
.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

EAC Finalizes Industrialisation Policy and Strategy

East African Community (EAC) Secretariat is in the final stages of completing a regional industrialization policy which is to among others promote regional industries.


EAC is in the process of formulating its Industrialization policy and strategy, which is expected to provide a detailed regional framework for cooperation in the field of Industrial and small and medium enterprises (SME) development," said the EAC Head of Corporate Communications and Public Affairs Richard Owora.


He revealed that the regional industries whose economic benefits extend beyond national boundaries that have been identified include: pharmaceutical, automotive, agricultural machinery and tools, basic metal, petrochemicals, Information Communication Technology (ICT) and computer and SME development among others. 


"That is why the secretariat with support from the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) held a five-day experts meeting to review the draft EAC industrialization policy and strategy in Uganda. He said the discussions revolved around formulating policy inputs and recommendations from the stakeholders for the finalization of the policy and strategy, identification of priority regional industries to be promoted on comparative advantages, identification of policy interventions projects and programmes to be undertaken at national and regional levels and to update the draft final documents.

"The goal of cooperation in industrial development is to enable partner states to collectively and individually attain accelerated, harmonious, and balanced development, as envisioned in the EAC Treaty," he said adding that the draft policy and strategy has identified several industries, which will be promoted through collective community efforts, so as to realize economies of scale and attain international competitiveness.

Uganda's Director of Trade, Industry and Co-operative in the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Co-operative, Mr Samuel Ssenkungu noted that industrialization and technological diffusion have both potential to make a sustainable contribution to economic growth and job creation in the region.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

EAC to review Rules of Origin


The East African Community is set to review border passage rules for goods, paving the way for more Kenyan exports to access the regional market. The bloc’s custom and trade division has invited consultants to align the rules of origin with changes in manufacturing to facilitate intra-regional trade in the region.


“We expect the reviewed rules of origin to capture as many changes including transport costs that have grown in importance for firms,” Peter Kiguta, EAC’s director-general in charge of trade and custom said in a telephone interview.
Mr Kiguta also said the review would prepare the region for an eventual merger with Comesa and SADC. The rules will also be phased out once a single EAC revenue collector is set up.
Trade Mark East Africa has floated the tender asking consultants to simplify the rules of origin so that they can be implemented easily.
The present rules of origin only allow goods produced wholly from local inputs to cross national borders without attracting custom taxes.
Goods produced from imported raw materials also enjoy duty-free treatment where the exporter can prove that at least 35 per cent of the ex-factory value was added within the region.
The proof is usually that the local transformation process has moved the product to a tariff category different from that of imported parts or inputs.
The application of this rule has been controversial, with traders claiming it is selectively applied by customs officials to bar Kenyan products from entering Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi.
The partners phased out duties on Kenyan goods that meet these rules from January after the end of the transition period. Some of the vehicles from the Nairobi-based General Motors East Africa and CMC Motors are among products affected by the rules of origin.
While assemblers stake their claim to the regional market on the number of jobs and operations involved, border officials have maintained that the process entails very little transformation on the completely knocked down vehicle parts.
The beauty products sold by Inter-consumer Products Ltd; Nido, Milk and Nescafe produced by Nestle Kenya; television sets manufactured by Aucma Digital Technology Africa; and lubricants manufactured by Kenol/Kobil have also encountered similar restrictions at border posts.
“Our market share has grown significantly in the region since the EAC’s verification mission cleared our products last year with Uganda becoming our largest market,” Charles Njogu, KenolKobil’s spokesman, said on Tuesday.
Kenya Revenue Authority officials said the rules of origin are now outdated because of rapid changes that have taken place since they were conceived more than six years ago.
The officials said they are encountering cases where genuine goods are being locked out simply because the rules are blind to their unique circumstances. The use of technology and other cost-efficient production techniques has rendered the 35 per cent value addition threshold irrelevant, KRA said, adding that a change in tariff heading alone would be more objective.



“Use of total cost to determine local value addition is not objective,” an official who could not be named under KRA protocols said yesterday. “An operation that contributed 35 per cent to total cost six years ago may have fallen to 20 per cent due to cost cutting. The RoO does not factor in investments that contribute to efficiency
Lately, Kenyan edible oil firms such as Kapa Oil and Bidco Oil have been fighting to defend their markets from custom officials who maintain the refining of imported crude palm oils does not meet the value addition threshold.
The firms import crude palm mainly from Asia to manufacture products such as cooking fats and soaps which they export to EAC and Comesa countries.
“In this case, refining process is the huge but hidden investment that must be recognised for the rules of origin to make sense to exporters,” said the KRA official.

Friday, September 9, 2011

Tripartite FTA COMESA-EAC-SADC

The Second Tripartite Summit of Heads of State and Government (COMESA-EAC-SADC) took place on 12 June, 2011, in Johannesburg, South Africa. A major achievement of the summit includes the official launch of negotiations on the Tripartite Free Trade Area (FTA). Agreement was reached on the negotiating principles, processes, scope and institutional framework. A roadmap and timelines for establishing the FTA were also agreed.
Negotiations will be open to all the 26 countries of the COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite. It was agreed that the first phase of negotiations will address tariff liberalisation, rules of origin, customs cooperation and customs related matters, non-tariff barriers, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, technical barriers to tade and dispute settlement. The second phase will focus on negotiation trade in services and trade related issues, including intellectual property rights competition policy and trade development and competitiveness, . Facilitating movement of business persons within the region will be negotiated in parallel with the first phase as a separate track..
A timeline of 36 months has been set for completion of negotiations for the first phase and the movement of business person which will run concurrently. No timeframe has, however, been indicted for the second and final phase of FTA negotiations. .
Once in place, the Tripartite FTA will establish a larger market for Eastern and Southern Africa - leading to improved trade performance and competitiveness for the region.
Resource materials can be accessed here.

The negotiations were concluded, see related materials here.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Kenya To Establish the Nairobi International Financial Centre

Kenya hopes to position itself as a financial services hub similar to other financial hubs in the world e.g. London, New York, Dublin, Mauritius and Johannesburg.

Towards this end, finance minister Hon. Uhuru Kenyatta has launched a committee that will guide the establishment of the Nairobi International Financial Centre (NIFC), whose key task will be integrate the domestic financial sector to others in the region and globally. The committee will come up with proposals on the preferred type, financial implications, funding options and an implementation plan for the centre. The Steering Committee for Nairobi International Financial Centre was gazette is now operational.

The term “international financial centre” (NFIC) is often used interchangeably with “tax haven” or “secrecy jurisdiction,” although the latter terms have more negative connotations. Scholars generally label as “tax havens” those territories that offer favourable tax regimes and bank secrecy laws designed to attract foreign investors.

An International Financial Center is part of Kenya's Vision 030 and the Vision pointed to Mauritius and the Seychelles as potential models for the Kenyan IFC. It is envisioned that the NIFC may grant tax incentives, including a maximum 10-year tax holiday, along with VAT and customs exemptions.

It is envisioned that the NIFC may grant tax incentives, including a maximum 10-year tax holiday, along with VAT and customs exemptions.  However the international Financial Center will transform the economy, but observers warn it could contribute to illicit financial flows, inequality and a lack of transparency.

Meanwhile, in the regional context the World Bank has provided funding for the development of the  EAC Financial Sector Development & Regionalization Project and Financial Services is one of the 7 trade in services sectors to be liberalized under the EAC Common Market Protocol on the Free Movement of Services.

Setting up of the NIFC along with legal and institutional reforms are some of the projects envisioned for the financial sector under the country’s economic blueprint — vision 2030 — along with banking sector consolidation, pension reform and increasing diaspora remittances. 

The NIFC would also have a separate legal and judicial framework that would attract companies to set up shop.

See related story here.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

EAC Financial Services and Double Taxation Avoidance Treaty

The 9 year EAC Financial Sector Development & Regionalization Project, funded by the World Bank is a welcome development.   A strong regional financial sector is needed to underpin an effective common market and build a single financial services market for the region.  The development of a regional financial services sector, will also benefit the establishment of a monetary union and single currency.  In addition, the EAC region stands to gain by trading on a regional stock exchange, i.e a single East African Stock Exchange and furthermore, the harmonization of the financial services sector will play a key role in unlocking the removal of barriers for the free movement of capital across the EAC region- as provided for by the Common Market Protocol. 

In related news, the EAC region has apparently not implemented the Treaty on Avoidance of Double Taxation. The Double Taxation Treaty would allow income generated in any of the five member states to be taxed only once but lack of implementation has given national revenue bodies the legitimacy to maintain the status quo with revenue authorities making double claims for revenue earned in each individual country.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Kenya's MPESA to Spearhead Seamless Mobile Financial Transfers in the Continent

Michael Joseph, the immediate former CEO of Safaricom, has been tapped to spearhead the expansion of M-Pesa to other African countries as part of a plan to have a seamless mobile money transfer service on the continent.  M-Pesa is already successful in Kenya, and is now also available in Tanzania, Afghanistan, South Africa, while a pilot service is on in India.


But Vodafone is looking at spreading the services to other African countries such as DR Congo, Lesotho, and Mozambique with the aim of linking the market.  This will see mobile phone consumers send and receive money across borders in a move that will pile pressure on traditional money transfer service operators such as Western Union and Money Gram who have lost market share in the local market.

“M-Pesa is the most successful mobile money transfer service in the world and with Michael is a sure bet to drive its regional expansion having been behind its growth in Kenya,” said a senior executive at Safaricom who sought anonymity because he is not the firm’s spokesperson. “The rollout of the service in the new territories will not automatically enable registered Kenyan subscribers to send or receive money.

“But there is a plan to link them to these markets in coming years,” said the source. At present, Safaricom subscribers can receive money from the UK directly to their mobile phones in transactions carried out in partnership with Western Union and Vodafone. Mr Joseph retired from Safaricom in November after serving for 11 years and passed the leadership mantle to Bob Collymore.  He sits on the board of Safaricom and Johannesburg-based Vodacom, which is owned 65 per cent by the Vodafone Group — which has operations in five countries including South Africa, Tanzania, DR Congo, Lesotho and Mozambique.

It was under him that Safaricom rose to become East Africa’s largest and most successful firm in terms of earnings, and a market leader in Kenya’s mobile telephony market with a 76 per cent stake.  By 2005, Safaricom’s grip on the Kenyan mobile market had been cemented and in 2007 the company launched its mobile money transfer service M-Pesa — an innovation whose implementation was credited to Mr Joseph’s courage and which paid off handsomely winning over more than 13.5 million subscribers by September 2010.

Transactions worth Sh596.8 billion have gone through M-Pesa since its inception.  The service accounted for 11 per cent of Safaricom’s revenues or Sh5.2 billion in the six months to September this year up from Sh930 million in the same period in 2008.  Safaricom has used M-Pesa as a value added service, successfully using it to defend and attract subscribers from rival networks.

The service has driven a revolution of sorts in Kenya’s financial services where it is being used for payment of utility bills, dividend, goods at retail shops and banking services such as ATM withdrawals, deposits and cash transfers.  It is this market position that Vodafone seeks to replicate in five African countries served by Vodacom, especially DR Congo, Lesotho and Mozambique. Mr Joseph’s brief will be to shepherd the rollout of the product in the three countries and to shore up its performance in Tanzania and South Africa where the mobile money transfer service is yet to penetrate the market.

Low cost

The service was launched in South Africa in September and Tanzania in April 2008.  Nearly half (47 per cent) of all money transfers in Kenya now take place through the mobile phone, according to a survey by Financial Sector Deepening, a research firm that conducted the survey for the Central Bank of Kenya.

This has seen traditional money transfer service operators lose their grip on the market as more Kenyans turn to mobile phone-based platforms.  Popularity of the service is mainly hinged on the low cost of transaction, safety, and speed. Mr Joseph succeeded Mr Grieves-Cook who had served as the KTB chairman for two consecutive terms since his first appointment in November 2004.  Under his chairmanship, KTB managed to put up aggressive marketing campaigns targeting domestic and international tourists.

In addition, the organisation partnered with international travel and leisure groups as well as the media and airlines to build a strong image for Kenya as a niche tourist destination.

Nation Media

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Africa's Energy Infrastructure

Africa's 5 power pools are well illustrated in the 2010 Energy Atlas. The Energy Atlas also shows the current energy projects in the continent including the % of population with access to power. Despite various efforts to generate increased renewable and non renewable energy, Africa is the only continent estimated to generate less power than demand necessitates, in the next few decades.  

                                               Click to enlarge
Source: Africa Energy

Thursday, July 29, 2010

July 2010 SACU Summit

SACU continues to enjoy its centenary and uniquely, this year we have seen 2 SACU Summits with a third anticipated by the end of October 2010. The first Summit was held in April 2010, whereby the Heads of State and Government adopted a new mission and vision for SACU.  They also agreed on the institutionalization of the meetings of the SACU Heads of State and Government.

The second summit was held on July 16th 2010, and the Meeting issued a Communique which mandates Ministers to address challenges that SACU needs to resolve. The Summit further reiterated that SACU should be converted into a vehicle for regional integration and also recognized the role that SACU can play in Southern Africa as a building block for deeper regional integration. 

Some of the challenges mentioned in the communique are mandated in the 2002 SACU Treaty (e.g. revenue sharing, common policies, institutions etc). Some were also highlighted in the 2009 WTO Trade Policy Review of SACU. Other challenges highlighted by the Summit include: financing options for cross border projects, increasing intra-SACU trade, new generation issues, reviewing the 2002 SACU Agreement and development of a roadmap for an Economic Community and Monetary Union. 

One observation is that a unified SADC EPA position is not expressly mentioned.

The Communique can be accessed here.